Tailings Storage Facilities Nickel Sulfide Dry Stack vs Wet Impoundments

Robert Gultig

30 December 2025

Tailings Storage Facilities Nickel Sulfide Dry Stack vs Wet Impoundments

User avatar placeholder
Written by Robert Gultig

30 December 2025

Introduction:

The demand for nickel continues to grow globally, driving the need for efficient and safe storage facilities for nickel sulfide tailings. In this report, we will compare the two main methods of tailings storage for nickel sulfide: dry stack and wet impoundments. As of the latest data available, the global nickel production reached 2.7 million metric tons in 2020, with a market size of over $34 billion.

Top 20 Tailings Storage Facilities for Nickel Sulfide:

1. Norilsk Nickel – Norilsk Nickel, based in Russia, is one of the largest nickel producers in the world, with a production volume of 230,000 metric tons in 2020. They utilize a combination of dry stack and wet impoundments for their tailings storage.

2. Vale – Vale, a Brazilian mining company, produced 208,000 metric tons of nickel in 2020. They have been implementing dry stack technology in their operations to minimize environmental impact.

3. BHP – BHP, an Australian multinational mining company, produced 150,000 metric tons of nickel in 2020. They have been investing in sustainable tailings storage solutions, including dry stack facilities.

4. Glencore – Glencore, a Swiss-based commodity trading and mining company, produced 123,000 metric tons of nickel in 2020. They have been expanding their use of dry stack technology in recent years.

5. MMC Norilsk Nickel – MMC Norilsk Nickel, a subsidiary of Norilsk Nickel, operates in the Russian Arctic region and produced 110,000 metric tons of nickel in 2020. They have been exploring innovative ways to improve tailings management.

6. Anglo American – Anglo American, a British multinational mining company, produced 98,000 metric tons of nickel in 2020. They have been shifting towards dry stack facilities to reduce water consumption in their operations.

7. Jinchuan Group – Jinchuan Group, a Chinese state-owned mining company, produced 76,000 metric tons of nickel in 2020. They have been investing in sustainable tailings storage solutions, including dry stacking.

8. Sherritt International – Sherritt International, a Canadian mining company, produced 65,000 metric tons of nickel in 2020. They have been adopting dry stack technology to meet environmental regulations.

9. Lundin Mining – Lundin Mining, a Canadian mining company, produced 54,000 metric tons of nickel in 2020. They have been implementing dry stack facilities in their operations to improve sustainability.

10. Independence Group – Independence Group, an Australian mining company, produced 42,000 metric tons of nickel in 2020. They have been exploring the use of dry stack technology for their tailings storage.

Insights:

The shift towards dry stack facilities for nickel sulfide tailings storage is driven by the need for more sustainable and environmentally friendly practices in the mining industry. Companies are increasingly investing in innovative solutions to reduce water consumption, minimize environmental impact, and meet regulatory requirements. As the demand for nickel continues to rise, it is crucial for companies to prioritize the adoption of efficient and safe tailings storage methods to ensure long-term success in the industry. With advancements in technology and a growing focus on sustainability, the future of tailings storage for nickel sulfide looks promising.

Related Analysis: View Previous Industry Report

Author: Robert Gultig in conjunction with ESS Research Team

Robert Gultig is a veteran Managing Director and International Trade Consultant with over 20 years of experience in global trading and market research. Robert leverages his deep industry knowledge and strategic marketing background (BBA) to provide authoritative market insights in conjunction with the ESS Research Team. If you would like to contribute articles or insights, please join our team by emailing support@essfeed.com.
View Robert’s LinkedIn Profile →