July 1, 2025 marks a significant shift in the food and beverage industry as the US FDA officially banned the use of PFAS-based grease-proofing agents in food packaging. While the ban is not mandatory, it has effectively phased out the use of these ‘forever chemicals’ in food packaging. This move has sparked increased scrutiny on companies still utilizing PFAS and has led to legal battles, such as the cases against The Hershey Company for allegedly high levels of PFAS in their packaging.
The Impact on Food Companies
The ban on PFAS in food packaging has put food companies under the microscope, with consumers and regulators demanding cleaner and safer packaging solutions. The cases against The Hershey Company highlight the legal, financial, and reputational risks associated with PFAS contamination in packaging. Companies now face the challenge of transitioning to PFAS-free alternatives to meet consumer expectations and regulatory requirements.
Regulatory Landscape and Compliance
While the FDA has taken steps to phase out PFAS in food packaging, progress at the federal level has been slow. A bipartisan bill aiming to ban PFAS in food packaging nationwide remains stuck in the House Energy and Commerce Committee. In the absence of federal action, several states have enacted their own bans on intentionally added PFAS in food packaging, putting pressure on food manufacturers to comply with varying regulations across different states.
Global Implications
The European Union has taken a decisive step in banning PFAS in food-contact packaging above trace levels by August 2026. This regulation applies not only to EU-based companies but also to imported goods, impacting global brands like Nestlé, Mondelez, and Ferrero. Companies operating in international markets will need to adapt to these stricter regulations to avoid being shut out of major consumer markets.
Strategic Outlook for Food and Beverage Industry
The shift away from PFAS in food packaging presents both challenges and opportunities for the food and beverage industry. Companies that proactively transition to PFAS-free packaging solutions stand to benefit from enhanced consumer trust and compliance with regulatory requirements. However, failure to address PFAS contamination in packaging could lead to costly recalls, lawsuits, and damage to brand reputation.
Industry Analysis
The ban on PFAS in food packaging has far-reaching implications for global pricing, logistics, and F&B planning. Companies will need to invest in research and development to find sustainable and safe alternatives to PFAS in packaging. Supply chains may need to be reevaluated to ensure compliance with evolving regulations, and pricing strategies may need to be adjusted to account for the costs associated with transitioning to PFAS-free packaging solutions. Overall, the industry is facing a transformative period as it navigates the shift away from ‘forever chemicals’ in food packaging.