Protein enters a new era of innovation



KANSAS CITY, MO. — Most Americans are trying to consume protein, and the desire to get more continues to rise (59% in 2022, 67% 2023 and 71% 2024), according to the 2024 Food and Health Survey from the International Food Information Council (IFIC), Washington, D.C.

Protein is the only macronutrient that has not been demonized, and industry professionals don’t see demand slowing down. The challenge is with climate change threatening global food security, it is paramount that new sources of protein continue to be identified. That’s happening.

“The hottest day on Earth in modern history was just recorded in July, further fueling conversation about climate change in general and its effects on the global food supply specifically,” said Randy Kreienbrink, director-food, beverage and specialty, Artemis International, Fort Wayne, Ind. “Extreme weather is intensifying pressure on traditional protein sources, such as livestock and fisheries, by altering their habitats and reducing their populations. This makes exploring and developing alternative protein options imperative. A diversified protein supply chain, including plant-based and novel protein ingredients, is crucial for global food security and resilience.”

Consumers are recognizing they can do their part through protein diversification. It’s fine to enjoy a beef hotdog when at the ballpark, and then for lunch the next day, have a veggie burger.

Globally, 43% of plant-forward consumers believe it’s healthier to get protein from a wider variety of sources, according to ADM Outside Voice, Global Protein Consumer Discovery Report, January 2023. This has increased in significance since 2020, according to Jacquelyn Schuh, global senior director-product marketing for specialty ingredients, ADM, Chicago.

“It’s not an all-or-nothing approach to protein consumption, and there is opportunity to add more protein into the diets by consuming both animal- and plant-based protein,” Schuh said. “This, in turn, is fueling new opportunities to diversify plant protein sources, as well as bring together multiple sources of proteins through hybrids or blends.”

Ingredient innovation

To support more protein choices and eating occasions for alternative proteins, ingredient suppliers continue to invest in technology to offer more options. ADM, for example, introduced a line of low-sodium functional and dispersible pea protein powders, in addition to new textured pea proteins (conventional and low sodium).

“These introductions and extensions are crucial to supporting functional formulation needs, as well as nutritional value, including optionality for various lifestyle diets, protein content, protein diversification and the sensory experience,” Schuh said. “This comes at a time when consumers are increasingly engaging in GLP-1 agonists. With smaller portion sizes, consumers will want to make purposeful decisions on what they eat to get the nutrient density they need. Foods with high-protein and fiber content are critical to this dietary need, and plant proteins have the potential to offer protein and fiber coming from a plant-derived source.”

Mark Fahlin, category marketing manager-health and nutrition, Cargill, Minneapolis, concurred. “One of the biggest developments in the plant protein space is the continuous improvement we’re seeing in the functionality of botanical proteins. For example, our joint venture partner PURIS has expanded its pea protein line-up with products developed for specific plant-based applications.”

They don’t have to be meat and dairy analogs. Maybe it’s a smoothie or snack chips. New specialty protein ingredients make creative applications more viable.

“Plant proteins are notoriously unstable in more acidic applications,” Fahlin said. “At IFT FIRST 2024, Cargill featured an acid-stable plant protein in a strawberry dragon fruit smoothie. The prototype was packed with 21 grams of total protein and had a clean taste and stability in solution.”

Ingredion Inc., Westchester, Ill., launched a new pea protein at IFT FIRST that was optimized for application in cold-pressed sports and nutrition bars. Such bars tend to become hard with a dry texture over a short time.

“Our technical experts developed a cold-pressed bar model system and swapped competitive protein sources one-for-one,” said Michael Valenti, manager, global innovation business lead of healthful solutions protein fortification at Ingredion.  “Additionally, we assessed the same model system against commercially available bars using a third-party survey to gauge consumer preference. This new pea protein showed desirable and predictably stable softness over shelf life, and among pea protein competitors measured, had low pulse flavor and significantly lower chalky/gritty mouthfeel.”

ChickP Protein Ltd., Rehovot, Israel, has patented technology to manufacture a 90% chickpea isolate. By removing most of the oil from chickpeas, the company is able to concentrate the protein and achieve a clean, neutral taste with a longer shelf life than other chickpea protein ingredients. That’s because the lower fat content reduces the chance of oxidation, a major contributor to off flavor development.

“A key challenge in fortifying energy snacks with vegan forms of protein, for example, is avoiding a bitter aftertaste while retaining a crispy texture,” said Maor Dahan, head of development and applications for ChickP. “Our chickpea isolate solves both challenges. It has a neutral flavor plus a fine consistency for seamless integration. Moreover, it is a complete protein providing all the essential amino acids, including naturally occurring branch-chain amino acids essential for building and maintaining muscle mass.”

New technologies and raw materials

Advanced technologies are helping with ingredient innovation. When artificial intelligence is put on the team, commercialization of these ingredients tends to occur significantly faster.

“Precision fermentation is not just a buzzword. It’s a game-changer,” Kreienbrink said. “This technique holds immense potential for creating sustainable, high-quality protein ingredients. By optimizing microbial fermentation processes, we can produce tailored proteins with specific functional and nutritional attributes. Precision fermentation has the power to revolutionize both plant- and animal-derived protein production, and in that regard, the future looks promising.”

Onego Bio Ltd., uses precision fermentation to manufacture a bio-identical egg protein. As a U.S.-Finnish company, Onego is in the process of commercializing the production process in North America and is on track to submit a Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) notice to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration this year with the hope of receiving a “no questions” letter in 2025. Founded in 2022 as a spinoff from VTT Technical Research Center of Finland, Onego is already working with major food companies on product innovation in everything from baked goods, snacks and pasta to sauces and meat alternatives.

Eggs are one of the world’s most used animal proteins. As an ingredient, they assist with binding, thickening, leavening, emulsifying and more; however, the current egg production system is not sustainable, according to Maija Itkonen, chief executive officer of Onego.

“But there’s an alternative way with precision fermentation,” Itkonen said. “We can create proteins that are bio-identical to the foods we know and love. And we can do that using 90% less resources, without major risks such as pandemics.

“We have taken a microflora called Trichoderma reesei and trained it to produce ovalbumin, the main protein found in egg white, instead of its own enzymes,” she explained. “In a way, we have domesticated this hungry fungus and turned it into a living factory. And the fungus quite likes it. When we feed it plenty of glucose, it’s as happy as can be.”

Fungus can make protein with high efficiency and volume. Mycoprotein, also known as mycelium-based protein, for example, is produced from fungi using fermentation technology. Cargill is working with ENOUGH, Sas van Gent, The Netherlands, to produce large-scale mycoprotein ingredients. The ingredient is grown by feeding fungi with sugars from sustainably sourced grain, which is then fermented in a natural production process.

“It’s much like making beer, wine or yogurt,” Fahlin said. “The mycoprotein is a complete food ingredient that contains essential amino acids and is high in dietary fiber. It is produced through a zero-waste fermentation process, with Cargill’s glucose syrup as a main source.”

Protein ingredients are also being made from side streams, a process often referred to as upcycling. This is when the raw materials now being used to make ingredients would have otherwise not been used for human consumption.

Revyve, a food tech company based in Wageningen, The Netherlands, introduced its high-performance egg-replacement ingredient at IFT FIRST. The texturizing ingredient is made from upcycled brewer’s yeast and is designed to be used in baked goods and plant-based meats. When paired with other ingredients, the ingredient can eliminate the need for methylcellulose, a common ingredient in plant-based burgers that has a “non-clean label” reputation.

“Yeast has been the star of the show in beer brewing, winemaking and bread baking for millennia,” said Edgar Suarez Garcia, chief technology officer and co-founder. “At Revyve, we have taken yeast functionality to the next level. Products manufactured with Revyve single-ingredient yeast proteins take on true-to-form textures. Revyve offers exceptional heat-set gelling, binding and emulsification. Burgers retain water and oil at hot and cold temperatures. They brown and sizzle on the grill and hold their shape when flipped and sandwiched in a bun. 

“When burger producers ask how the ingredient performs, we explain that it behaves like egg whites,” he said. “When cooked in a patty mixture, Revyve becomes firm yet springy, forming a binding network around the other ingredients. The secret lies in the unique combination of functional proteins and fibers created by our patented technology.”

The ingredient also has application in animal-meat products such as meatballs and nuggets, as well as hybrid products. It allows formulators to eliminate the egg allergen.

Angel Yeast Company, Hubei, China, also offers yeast protein ingredients that are extracted from natural brewer’s yeast. One of the company’s newest naturally fermented yeast protein ingredients contains all nine essential amino acids and possesses an 80% protein content, according to the company. This versatile ingredient is used to enhance the flavor and nutritional profile of vegan cheese, ice cream, dairy products, protein drinks, protein bars, cheese-flavored crackers, whole wheat bread and vegan meat. It can be used to make high-protein whole wheat bread and nutrition bars, and it may also be used in combination with other proteins.

“As a new focal point category, hybrids and blended solutions are an important part of growing this acceptance, bridging the gap between the familiar and new,” Schuh said. “When asked about technological advances (in our survey), global plant-forward consumers stated they’re most interested in trying novel plant-based ingredients, such as sunflower, canola, algae, chickpea proteins within plant-based alternatives (dairy or meat).”

This was followed by hybrid/blended options. These are combinations of familiar proteins, plant-derived and animal-derived, and combinations of plant-derived or animal-derived proteins with new technologies such as precision fermentation and cell cultivation.

“Overall, consumer acceptance of new technologies for protein development is progressing,” Schuh said.

Hybrid foods provide a feasible approach for novel food ingredients to enter the market despite the scalability challenges, according to Emilia Nordlund, research team leader of food solutions at VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. This enables consumers to familiarize themselves with the novel proteins and production concepts and start reducing their animal meat intake while adapting to alternative proteins.



Source link

Pilgrim’s Q2 profits more than quintuple last year’s levels



GREELEY, COLO. — Pilgrim’s Pride Corp.’s disciplined diversification strategy paired with continued operational excellence have reaped their reward in the second quarter ended June 30. The company reported a profit of $326.5 million, equal to $1.37 per share on the common stock, up exceedingly by 436% from $60.9 million, or 25¢, from the same period last year.

Pilgrim’s posted a more modest but still significant jump of 5.8% in net sales from $4.3 billion in 2023 to $4.6 billion this year.

“Our global portfolio delivered significant year-over-year profitability growth,” said Fabio Sandri, president and chief executive officer of Pilgrim’s. “We remained disciplined in the execution of our strategies, focusing on what we can control and continuing to expand our relationships with key customers, elevating our performance as market fundamentals became increasingly attractive.”

Within the United States, the company’s Big Bird business benefited from enhanced commodity cutout values, further production efficiencies and lower input costs. Small Bird also grew, given increased demand from key customers in QSR (quick-service restaurant) and deli.

Differentiated and customized offerings helped Case Ready deliver above market growth as well.

As for Prepared Foods, Pilgrim’s saw success from further diversifying its portfolio through increased distribution of branded offerings and innovations across retail and foodservice.

“Our diversified US portfolio enabled our business to capture market upside as conditions evolved in the commodity market,” Sandri said. “At the same time, we also worked in partnership with our key customers to cultivate demand through promotional activity and innovation, further creating value for our customers and consumers alike. We also continued to strengthen our quality and service through operational excellence.”

Pilgrim’s completed a protein conversion plant in south Georgia in March and said the ramp up of production has remained on schedule as well as cultivated additional business.

“Our investment in protein conversion reinforces our strategies to drive profitable growth and mitigates our operational risk,” Sandri said. “We will continue to explore opportunities to strengthen our business and further diversify our portfolio.”

In Europe, consumer sentiment improved as wage growth surpassed inflation. Pilgrim’s diversified portfolio allowed it to meet the needs of consumers ready to exercise their wallets a little more liberally.

Pilgrim’s branded business grew by 7% compared to the previous year, Sandri noted in an earnings call on Aug. 1.

“Europe’s performance demonstrates the robust nature of our strategies and agility of our team,” he said. “Our diversified portfolio allowed us to rapidly adjust to consumer preferences and meet key customer needs. These efforts were further amplified by continued operational excellence to improve production efficiencies.”

Rounding out Pilgrim’s strong performance in Q2 was improvement in its Mexico operations. Several factors contributed to its results, including continued balance in supply and demand fundamentals, growth across retail and foodservice, and momentum gained in Pilgrim’s Fresh and Prepared business segments.

Following the positive postings, Pilgrim’s still sees potential for more growth in Mexico.

“Given our investments to expand production, we have an opportunity to further develop our marketplace presence and diversify our portfolio,” Sandri said.



Source link

Posted on Categories Poultry

WASDE updates meat production estimates for 2024



WASHINGTON — In its July World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) report, the US Department of Agriculture stated that it would slightly decrease its meat and poultry production estimates for 2024. Numbers released by the agency showed the new projection at 107.127 billion lbs for red meat and poultry, which is down 1 million lbs from the same report in June. 

USDA said the WASDE figures were “lowered slightly from last month with lower forecast broiler and turkey production more than offsetting higher beef and pork.”

“Pork production is raised this month based on increased weights for the second half of the year. Beef production is raised with higher expected steer and heifer slaughter more than offsetting reduced cow slaughter,” the report said. “Broiler production is lowered on slaughter data for the second quarter. Turkey production is lowered due to reduced expectations for the second half of the year based on recent production and hatchery data.”

Pork production forecasts were raised as a reflection of stated producers’ farrowing intentions for the second half of 2024 as stated in the June Quarterly Hogs and Pigs report. 

“Broiler production is lowered based on a slower rate of growth in first-quarter production,” WASDE said. “Turkey production is lowered as expected weaker producer returns for the remainder of 2024 slow growth in 2025.”

WASDE also estimated that beef imports in 2024 will decrease given the expected global competition. However, beef exports have increased due to stronger-than-expected demand in several key markets, according to the agency. No changes were made to the beef trade forecast in 2025.

“The 2024 broiler export forecast is raised slightly, reflecting recent trade data,” the report said. “No changes are made to broiler exports in 2025. The turkey export forecast for 2024 is lowered on recent trade data. Turkey exports for 2025 are raised on expected improved demand.”



Source link

Posted on Categories Meat

Maple Leaf undeterred by Q2 net loss



MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO — After a short-term decline in the first quarter, Maple Leaf Foods Inc. remains optimistic about its performance following second quarter results. The company said it is on track to meet its 2024 priorities and to execute a transformative spinoff of its pork business.

For the period ended June 30, 2024, the company reported a net loss of C$26.2 million ($27.47 million), equal to C21¢ (15¢) per share on the common stock, an improvement from last year’s loss of C$53.7 million, or C44¢ per share.

Total quarterly sales dipped to C$1.26 billion ($918 million), a 4% drop compared to C$1.27 billion from the same period last year. Adjusted operating earnings increased year-over-year to C$78.1 million ($56.88 million) compared to C$45.9 million.

“Several key elements contributed to our performance, including 3.2% year-over-year sales growth in our prepared meats business, improved pork market conditions, growth in our sustainable meats portfolio, better overall sales mix and contributions from our large capital projects,” said Curtis Frank, president and chief executive officer of Maple Leaf Foods.

Overall, sales in the Prepared Foods business increased approximately 1%, which was driven in part by success in the prepared meats segment. Maple Leaf noted that the 3.2% sales growth in prepared meat was partially offset by declines in poultry and plant protein of 3.9% and 2.5%, respectively, year-over-year. Sales in the Pork operating unit did not see the same success, decreasing 4.2% compared to last year.

Currently, Maple Leaf is prioritizing disciplined capital management, evident in its drop of capital expenditures in the second quarter 2024 to C$16 million ($12 million) compared to $53 million ($39 million) the same period a year ago.

Maple Leaf’s main focus is on the move to separate its pork business, creating two publicly traded companies, which was announced in July.

“Looking ahead, we are on a clear path to unleashing the potential of our business by separating into two independent public companies, each primed for growth and positioned to be a leader in its field,” Frank said. “I am confident, that these two companies — Maple Leaf Foods and the new Pork Company — will unlock the value of their respective organizations for the benefit of all stakeholders, with dedicated management teams and the financial independence to pursue their own value creation strategies. This will be the next exciting milestone step in executing the Maple Leaf playbook.” 



Source link

Posted on Categories Meat

New kid on the kill floor


After nearly two years working with MEAT+POULTRY, I set foot for the first time into a USDA-inspected slaughtering facility. I was welcomed in as part of the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s inaugural class for the Harvest & Fabrication School, a three-day course offering a comprehensive education of meat slaughtering across a variety of species. All 20 students — myself included — learned the ins and outs of meat processing through a mix of lectures, demonstrations and hands-on learning experiences.

Coming into the industry with little animal agriculture background or knowledge, I was unsure how well my brief two years of experience in the industry had equipped me for what lay ahead. I was thankful to find that the program was prepared for students like me as well as those with years of experience under their belt.

Class in session

Just like grade school, we rode together on a bus to the university for the first of our early morning lectures, where UW-Madison Professor and Meat Extension Specialist Jeff Sindelar, PhD, met us with a warm Wisconsin welcome. That first day, before Sindelar led the class through live demonstrations, two representatives from UltraSource LLC, Ethan Bubeck and Lane Egger, talked through the design of a kill floor.

“Obviously our goal is to make high quality, safe food products,” Egger said, referring to the big picture around which the entire layout of a meat plant is designed. Equally important to the design are the unique customizations necessary to meet each individual processor’s workload.

“Ideally when we start with our kill floor design, this is something that we want to have — which is everything you’d be wanting to do — in front of us and so that way we can hammer it out and have that planned for you to last for decades and your entire business cycle,” Egger said.

Walking into the UW-Madison’s facility, it was clear Sindelar and his team had thought through the many intricacies of the slaughter and fabrication process that often get overlooked. Sindelar noted to the class that, while his team had spent about a decade planning the facility, there were still details that later had to be adjusted to improve the process. For example, the structure of the holding pens was modified following the original design to accommodate for a smoother flow of the animals without sharp edges for them to get cornered into.

As our class prepared to transition into the USDA-inspected facility, we followed the site’s sanitation protocols, donning red frocks on entry, which we traded for white disposable frocks and yellow hard hats as we entered the kill floor. Sindelar pointed out that as part of the facility’s standard operating procedures, all persons who enter the grounds wear certain colors to coordinate with the different area functions, like how the harvest area featuring yellow floors requires personnel to wear yellow hard hats and yellow water-proof overalls, while the packaging area with blue floors requires a blue frock and blue gloves. Every floor color also corresponds to its own drain.

But first, beef

By the time our class toured the 25,000-square-foot facility, which was stocked with the latest equipment from suppliers such as All Power Inc. and Marel, the barely three-year-old facility still had the sparkle and shine of a new car.

The live demonstrations began with two beef cattle. This first day, as students, we stood back while many of the guest speakers and university students and staff did the heavy lifting. We simply tried to take in the many moving parts of the harvest process while keeping out of the way — a task that got more difficult as more animals were brought onto the scene.

Soon after the first of the cattle was stunned, bled and moved onto a cradle for skinning, another was led from the holding pen into the knocking pen. The university uses a series of dimmed lights to calmly transition the animal onto the kill floor. Once the cattle are securely restrained and still, a pneumatic captive bolt stunner is placed on the animal’s forehead and triggered to render it insensible prior to shackling and bleeding.

If for any reason, the animal is not knocked out by a single blow, it is considered an egregious offense by the US Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). To avoid potential penalties, the university has created a backup plan: a firearm to be used only as needed.

Strategies to avoid this kind of scenario are important, pointed out Ryan Malone with KOCH Supplies.

“I’m sure all of you are aware what happens if something goes wrong in the knocking chute,” he said. “It’s the second-fastest way to get shut down. The fastest is punching an inspector.”

Malone recommended minimizing the stress placed on workers doing the knocking as well as exercising patience with an animal that is stressed and moving around by taking a step back until the situation deescalates.

The UW-Madison considered several scenarios for backup plans in case standard operating procedures go awry, but thanks to the thoroughness of the university’s HACCP plans, no major backup plans were needed during my time there.

After the cattle were harvested, we witnessed the same process but with three lambs. I found it interesting how two very different species could follow such similar slaughter processes due to the same basic anatomy. There were, of course, clear visual differences like how the color of the meat was lighter for lamb and the size of the animals, but on the whole the cattle and lambs were both stunned, bled, skinned and eviscerated the same.

One of the biggest takeaways I walked away with that day was a greater appreciation for the labor that goes into harvesting an animal. Working for a news outlet, I often see the latest automation and technology designed to simplify manual labor. For that reason, seeing the amount of work — the literal sweat and blood — that is required to slaughter an animal was very impressive. Like I said, the UW-Madison was not lacking in modern equipment, but even when leveraging the pulley systems and hydraulics, human hands did the hard work of removing the hide, pushing the animal to the next station and splitting the massive carcass.

Once the USDA inspector checks over the carcass, it is sprayed down to remove any remaining contaminants before moving into the freezer. Source: Sosland Publishing Co./Rachael Oatman

Down and dirty

Day two of the course, UW-Madison amped up the demonstrations by opening them up to participation. On top of the scheduled lectures, we had a full day slaughtering eight hogs.

Sindelar walked us through two alternate stunning methods for hogs: captive bolt and controlled atmosphere stunning. The former followed the same procedure used on the cattle and lambs, while the latter allowed for several pigs to be stunned at once. The pigs enter a chamber that drops into a 15-foot pit filled with carbon dioxide.

Sindelar pointed out several benefits to controlled atmosphere stunning. It can lead to improved meat quality, as the animal is often less stressed through this method.

“It’s a very calm, very relaxing, very humane process,” he said, later adding. “Not only is it more relaxing for the animals; it’s more relaxing for the workers.”

Catherine Pierce, frontline supervisor for FSIS, noted that CO2 stunning is most common with swine even though it has been approved for sheep and calves as well.

The university demonstrated two ways to remove hair from the pigs. The first was simply dehiding it like seen with the cattle and lambs. The other method involved a scalder, where a hog was placed into a machine with rubber paddles and water between 150°F and 155°F. As the hog rolls around in the machine, the hot water loosens the hair follicles while the rubber paddles brush them away. Sindelar noted that one con to this method is hair will often still be left in crevices.

“If the water temperature is too high, it could melt the collagen, and it could create chunks of skin that actually get pulled off,” he said. “If the water temperature is too cold — not warm enough — the hair follicles won’t release very well, and you’ll have a whole hairy hog coming out.”

What I enjoyed most about our time on the kill floor this day was seeing seasoned line workers from our class jumping in right next to newcomers like me, getting a piece of the meat, so to say. Some started small with shackling pigs straight out of the gas stunning chamber, while others dove straight into the evisceration station.

A cut above the rest

On our third and final day, we tested out the fabrication room. Considerably colder than the kill floor, the fabrication room temperature was set at 40°F while we completed group activities using the hogs we slaughtered the day before.

Jake Sailer from Elmwood, Wis.-based Sailer’s Meats led us through a tutorial on the various cuts of meat — ribs, picnic shoulders, slab bacon, bone-in ham and other major cuts.

Later, given our own individual cutting board and whole chicken, we followed Jessica Brown, graduate research assistant with the UW-Madison, as she separated the breasts, tenderloins, wings, thighs and legs.

I walked away feeling more knowledgeable about the food I eat and confident in where it comes from. Plus, now I can say I survived the kill floor.



Source link

Posted on Categories Meat

GRSB to hold sixth Global Conference on Sustainable Beef



COLORADO SPRINGS, COLO. — The Global Roundtable for Sustainable Beef (GRSB) is preparing for the sixth Global Conference on Sustainable Beef, Sept. 30-Oct. 3, which will bring together leaders in the beef value chain to report on measurable sustainability improvements.

As a global organization with members from 24 different countries, GRSB is responsible for almost two-thirds of cross-border beef trade. The group champions who some claim is impossible — sustainable beef.

During the conference, which will meet in Punta del Este, Uruguay, panel discussions and expert testimonies will shed light on advancements toward sustainable beef.

“Farmers and ranchers are caretakers of the land, animals, environment, people and communities around the world, and have continually adopted new and improved practices for many generations,” said Bob Lowe, GRSB president and beef producer from western Canada. “As a rancher myself, I look forward to the opportunity to discuss the progress on global goals and opportunities with our diverse beef sustainability community that have come together through the GRSB.”

Mark Lyons, president and chief executive officer of Alltech, will give the Global Conference Keynote Address. As part of the event, Alltech will premiere its newest film documentary, World Without Cows, on Sept. 30.

Session topics will include:

  • Calculating Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Livestock and Pathways for Region-Specific Emissions Reductions
  • Technology and Audits Matter – But People Make the Difference!
  • Nature Positive Production: Protecting Ecosystems
  • Building Better Beef Supply Chains
  • Communicating Success Stories in Global Beef Sustainability
  • Regional Perspective on Cattle Production
  • Data & Innovation Driving Sustainability
  • International Advocacy

Closing out the sessions, Fernanda Hoe, general manager of Elanco Brasil will give the Capstone Address.

On the pre-general session day, Sept. 30, roundtables, who represent GRSB regional and national partners from Latin America, North America, Europe and the Pacific, will hold a meeting to discuss their progress and challenges in reaching their common goals.



Source link

Posted on Categories Meat

Meat Institute, NCC push back against Harris price-gouging proposal



WASHINGTON — Vice President Kamala Harris described various economic proposals for her presidential campaign, including a federal ban on price gouging on Aug. 16.

In her prepared remarks, Harris talked about “soaring meat prices accounting for a large part of Americans’ higher grocery bills even as meat processing companies registered record-breaking profits following the pandemic.” 

Harris also mentioned that in the first 100 days she plans to bring down grocery costs by using the resources of the federal government to identify and take on price-fixing and other anti-competitive practices in the food and grocery industries.

Following the campaign proposal, the Meat Institute came out against this move by the Democratic nominee.

“Consumers have been impacted by high prices due to inflation on everything from services to rent to automobiles, not just at the grocery store,” said Julie Anna Potts, president and chief executive officer of the Meat Institute. “A federal ban on price gouging does not address the real causes of inflation.

“The Harris campaign rhetoric unfairly targets the meat and poultry industry and does not match the facts,” Potts continued to say. “Food prices continue to come down from the highs of the pandemic. Prices for meat are based on supply and demand. Avian influenza, a shortage of beef cattle and high input prices like energy and labor are all factors that determine prices at the meat case. Prices that livestock producers receive for their animals are also heavily influenced by supply and demand. Prices for cattle producers especially are at record highs, surpassing the 2014-2015 previous record highs.”

Potts pointed out that in 2024 cattle prices will remain at record levels due to the United States having the lowest cattle inventory since 1951.

“Major meat companies have reported losses during the Biden-Harris administration, with some closing facilities and laying off workers,” Potts added.

The National Chicken Council (NCC) also came out against Harris’ proposed policies before her speech. 

“Americans are seeing inflation in nearly every part of their livelihoods — rent, gas, automobiles, furniture — not just in the meat case,” said Gary Kushner, interim president of NCC. 

He added that chicken prices are largely affected by supply and demand; major input costs like corn, soybeans, energy, packaging and transportation; and by fiscal policy and burdensome government regulations — not by price gouging. 

“It’s time for this administration to stop using the meat and poultry industry as a scapegoat and a distraction for the root causes of inflation and the significant challenges facing our economy,” Kushner said.

Earlier in March, the Meat Institute, NCC and other industry groups pushed back on a plan by the USDA to move forward with finalizing the “Inclusive Competition and Market Integrity Under the Packers and Stockyards Act.”

The agency said the new rule provides more effective standards under the Packers and Stockyards Act (PSA) that are designed to ensure fair access to economic opportunities in light of widespread consolidation in the markets over the last 30 years.



Source link

Posted on Categories Meat

USDA poultry, egg outlook projects steady growth through 2033



WASHINGTON — US poultry and egg production is projected to grow steadily through 2033, according to the US Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service (ERS). The agency’s annual 10-year projections assume no more outbreaks of animal disease, a continuation of existing US and global policies and trade agreements, normal weather, and specific macroeconomic conditions.

Coming off a long season of production volatility due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the sweeping reach of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreaks across the nation, ERS predicts prices for each of the major poultry products to become stable over the next decade as disease mitigation efforts are continually implemented.

More specifically, broiler and egg market prices are anticipated to increase moderately over the projection period, while turkey prices are expected to drop slightly as domestic demand weakens.

ERS reported poultry to be the most consumed animal protein in the United States, with 46% of all red meat and poultry consumption in 2023 to be from broiler and turkey meat — an accumulation of $50 billion worth.

Chicken production is estimated to grow from 45.7 billion lbs in 2022 to 52.5 billion lbs in 2033, surpassing previous records each year. Over the past few years, broiler production has weathered the health challenges without experiencing dramatic drops.

Turkey production did not fare as well through the pandemic and HPAI outbreaks. From 2017 to 2022, production declined 12.7% from 6 billion lbs to 5.2 billion lbs — the lowest production level of the century. ERS noted that the pandemic changed patterns of demand for turkey meat. Not helping matters, in 2022 an HPAI outbreak led to the depopulation of over 9 million turkeys, which was followed up by a second wave of the virus soon after.

Under the ERS’s assumption that the HPAI outbreaks have run their course, turkey production is estimated to grow 14% by 2033, reaching 6 billion lbs.

The egg industry is also recovering from HPAI hits. ERS projected egg production to recover in 2024 and continue to expand to a record of 10.8 billion dozen by 2033. However, recent forecasts for egg production in 2024 are lower, ERS noted, due to ongoing disease challenges.

The ERS report also included an outlook for poultry and egg producer prices. Farm prices for eggs peaked in 2022 at $2.39 per dozen but are projected to remain well below this high. ERS does not expect them to exceed $1.50 per dozen throughout the projection period.

Broiler farm prices also peaked in 2022 at $0.85 per pound. A decline is anticipated through 2028, dropping as low as $0.71 per pound before beginning a steady climb and reaching $0.75 per pound by 2033.

A slow but steady decrease in turkey prices throughout the projection period is likewise expected due to declining consumption of turkey meat along with higher production. Farm prices for turkey reached a high of $1.07 per pound in 2022. By 2025, they are expected to fall to $0.96 and by 2033 to $0.91. These projected prices are still above pre-2022 levels.



Source link

Posted on Categories Meat

CFO for Maple Leaf’s pork business spinoff named



MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO — In preparation for the spinoff of its pork business in 2025, Maple Leaf Foods Inc. announced Deepak Bhandari will serve as chief financial officer of the Pork Complex, effective in September.

Bhandari rejoins Maple Leaf Foods, where he had previously served for 13 years in progressively senior roles within the finance department.

“We are delighted to welcome Deepak to our team,” said Dennis Organ, president of Maple Leaf Foods’ Pork Complex and incoming chief executive officer of the new Pork Company. “Having previously been part of the Maple Leaf Foods organization, Deepak has a thorough understanding of our pork operations and the landscape of the business. We look forward to his financial leadership and expertise as we complete the work to execute the spin transaction and embark on the next step in our journey as an independent company.”

Most recently, Bhandari served as the interim CFO of High Liner Foods and is currently the company’s senior vice president of strategy and corporate development. He earned his bachelor’s degree in genetics from the University of Alberta and an MBA from Schulich Business School at York University.

In July, Maple Leaf unveiled its plans to separate into two public companies by spinning off its pork business. Each company is primed for growth and positioned to be a leader in their respective fields, Maple Leaf said. It added that the name of the new pork business will be announced in the coming months.

Headquartered in Mississauga, Ontario, Maple Leaf currently employs around 13,500 people and operates primarily in Canada, the United States and Asia.



Source link

Posted on Categories Meat

Beef export value exceeds $900 million in May



WASHINGTON – US beef exports recorded the highest value in May, topping $900 million, the highest since June 2023, according to data released by the US Department of Agriculture and compiled by the US Meat Export Federation (USMEF).

Driven by strong performance in Japan, Mexico and Taiwan, May beef exports totaled 110,133 tonnes, down 5% from 2023 but the second largest of 2024, USMEF said. Beef export value reached $902.4 million in May, 3% above a year ago and the highest in 11 months. Exports trended higher year-over-year to Japan, Mexico, the ASEAN Region, the Middle East, the Caribbean and Central America — which included a record month for Guatemala. May export value was also higher for Taiwan. For January through May, beef exports followed a similar trend, increasing 5% year-over-year in value to $4.29 billion, despite a 4% decline in volume (533,578 tonnes).

“It has been encouraging to see demand stabilize in Japan, where US beef certainly faces significant headwinds,” said Dan Halstrom, USMEF president and chief executive officer. “The tourism boom has provided a much-needed lift for Japan’s foodservice sector, and it is a source of optimism for buyers and importers. Taiwan and the ASEAN region were also bright spots for US beef in May, along with Western Hemisphere markets such as Mexico, Guatemala and the Caribbean.”

Pork exports in May declined 4% compared to a year ago to total 251,447 tonnes and valued at $715.8 million (down 2%).

“Pork shipments to Mexico trended a bit lower in May, but that’s following a record April performance,” Halstrom said. “And even at that, export value to Mexico still topped $200 million. US pork also posted another great month in Korea and exports to the ASEAN region were the largest in three years. Demand also continued to strengthen in Central America and the Caribbean.”

Data from the period show shipments to leading market Mexico were below last year’s large volume but still trended higher in value. Pork exports increased year-over-year to South Korea, the ASEAN region, Central America and Colombia and held steady to Japan. Through the first five months of the year, pork exports advanced 6% to 1.29 million tonnes, while export value was 7% above last year’s record pace at $3.6 billion.

US lamb exports trended higher in May totaling 251 tonnes, up 78% from the low year-ago volume, while export value jumped 66% to $1.3 million. For January through May, lamb exports increased 11% from a year ago to 1,294 tonnes, while value climbed 25% to $7.2 million. USMEF said growth was driven primarily by the Caribbean, Mexico and Canada, but shipments also increased to the Philippines and Taiwan.



Source link

Posted on Categories Meat
Exit mobile version